2006-09-11

jenk: Faye (lilo)
2006-09-11 12:01 am

(no subject)

Happy Birthday
to
[livejournal.com profile] cindygerb!!!


I wish you a joyful celebration and a wonderful year!
jenk: Faye (daria esteem)
2006-09-11 11:05 am

On journalism and telling the story well

This post is by a former journalist. It's both about how she came to write the story of a Pearl Harbor survivor for the 50th anniversary of Pearl Harbor, and reflections on coverage of 9/11/2001.

I'm glad [livejournal.com profile] dakiwiboid pointed to it. It's well worth reading.

http://liz-marcs.livejournal.com/206303.html
jenk: Faye (DariaPensive)
2006-09-11 03:49 pm
Entry tags:

Rule of Three

I ran across this quote in a software testing article at Jonathan Kohl's blog.
Weinberg's "Rule of Three", which goes something like this: if you can't think of three ways a potential solution can fail, you don't completely understand the problem space.
Google found a couple other variations.
Jerry Weinberg says, “If you haven’t thought of three possibilities, you haven’t thought enough.”
- quoted at stickyminds
and
Whenever I'm aware that I'm making an interpretation, I have another choice: I can allow myself to know that more than one interpretation is possible. A good check on premature interpretation is the Rule of Three Interpretations:
If I can't think of at least three different interpretations of what I received, I haven't thought enough about what it might mean.
This rule slows down the Interpretation step and gives me, the receiver, a chance to engage my brain before using my mouth. Even after I have thought of three possible interpretations, however, I should always be aware of one more possibility: that my list still may not include your intending meaning.
-- Jerry Weinberg, Quality Software Management Vol 2, Chapter 6, quoted here
So, here are three varations on the Rule of Three...appropriate, no?