A window on how the FBI investigates

...and, arguably, wastes our money. As journalist Doug Thompson writes:

According to my file, the banks where I have both business and checking accounts have been forced to turn over all records of my transactions, as have every company where I have a charge account or credit card. They’ve perused my book borrowing habits from libraries in Arlington and Floyd Counties as well as studied what television shows I watch on the Tivos in my house. They know I belong to the National Rifle Association, the National Press Photographers Association and other professional groups. They know I attend meetings of Alcoholic Anonymous on a regular basis and the file notes that my “pattern of spending” shows no purchase of “alcohol-related products” since the file was opened in 2001.

How can such data be collected without you knowing about it?

My file begins on September 11, 2001, the day of the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington. A Marine guard standing post at the Navy Yard in Washington jotted down the license number of my Jeep Wrangler after I was spotted taking pictures of armed guards at the locked-down military facility. ( I answerd all the questions, officer... )

I thought the matter was dead until a few weeks ago when an old friend from Washington called, said he was in the area, and suggested lunch. At lunch, he showed me the 100-plus pages of the file on me that grew out of that first encounter with Agent Ryan of NCIS.

“Much of this information was gathered through what we call ‘national security letters,’” he said. “It allows us to gather information from a variety of sources.”

The FBI issues more than 30,000 national security letters a year. ( And they're prohibited from telling you about it. )

- Source: Capitol Hill Blue

I don't know this Doug Thompson; the article link was forwarded by a friend. But I do think this is RATHER interesting. A member of the National Press Photographers Association has, arguably, good reason to take pictures of a major news event. Yet the file remains open

because I am a “person of interest” who has “written and promoted opinions that are contrary to the government of the United States of America.”

Also, check out this bit:

In the past, when information collected on an American citizen failed to turn up any criminal activity, FBI policy called for such information to be destroyed.

But President George W. Bush in 2003 reversed that long-standing policy and ordered the bureau and other federal agencies to not only keep that information but place it in government databases that can be accessed by local, state and federal law enforcement agencies.

In October, Bush also signed Executive Order 13388 which expands access to those databases to “appropriate private sector entities” although the order does not explain what those entities might be.

Is that a windfall for identity thieves or what?

I wonder what would happen if a larger portion of the were to come to the FBI's attention. Would they drown in the overload? And if so, would that be a net gain or net loss for citizens like me?

Self-management & jet engines

I was digging through some old articles on http://www.joelonsoftware.com and ran across a link to this:

The jet engines are produced by nine teams of people -- teams that are given just one basic directive: the day that their next engine must be loaded onto a truck. All other decisions -- who does what work; how to balance training, vacations, overtime against work flow; how to make the manufacturing process more efficient; how to handle teammates who slack off -- all of that stays within the team.
[...]
Clearly, not everyone has the temperament, skills, or intellect needed to work in an environment like that of GE/Durham. So who, in particular, doesn't fit in? "People who expect to take orders". - Source: 1999 Fast company article

It sounds like a cool place to work. It is also very definitely a "self-managed" place -- unlike the team I was on for 6 months and then discovered it was supposed to be a "self-managed pilot project". Personally I think that if you expect the workers to take on the work traditionally done by middle managment, you need to *tell them*....