jenk: Faye (RainInSeattle)
Secretary of State's office is doing a fun thing - pictures of people who are pledging to vote.

http://www.secstate.wa.gov/elections/iwillvote/

Some have signs, some have shaped food into "I will vote", etc. One photo is also the background at http://twitter.com/secstatewa
jenk: Faye (MoandSyd)
As a former coworker put it, "Suffering election fatigue till I remembered that a McCain win means four more years of my country being run by people who hate me."

He adds, "[K]icked another $25 to the End This Goddamn Era Already fund."

Yeah, I donated yesterday. Should be getting an Obama-Biden car magnet too.

Okay, on the funny side...

[livejournal.com profile] theferrett quips 'So how does one advertise, "There's a 50/50 shot I'll drop dead in office, and you'll get your female President" cautiously?'

[livejournal.com profile] filkertom compares Sarah Palin with Michael Palin.

So...

Aug. 29th, 2008 09:55 am
jenk: Faye (Default)
The Republicans are up to 1984 nao?
jenk: Faye (Default)
It's about the election. If you just want to see responses, click "submit".

[Poll #1249991]
jenk: Faye (NancyDrew)
... don't vote for McCain.
In July, for example, a Pew poll showed that 56 percent of the electorate didn't know where McCain stood on abortion. [...] In 2000, McCain begged Bush to amend language in the GOP platform, which calls for a human-life amendment banning all abortions and provides no exceptions for rape, incest, or danger to the life of the mother. This week he indicated that he won't work to change that platform. That's a position espoused by fewer than 20 percent of the electorate. [...] He has bragged about his consistent zero rating from NARAL. He has explicitly said that his Supreme Court choices will be animated by his desire to overturn Roe.

Now, Barack Obama has taken some flak for his "above my pay grade" response to the question of when life begins at Saddleback. It was an artless attempt to connect with the 60 percent of Americans who believe that the abortion issue is simply too complicated for a five-word answer. John McCain really wants you to know that his answer is very, very simple.
Links in the above quote are from the source.
jenk: Faye (Default)
Quoting from "Strength to Love," a collection of sermons by the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr:

"The church must be reminded that it is not the master or the servant of the state, but rather the conscience of the state," King wrote. "It must be the guide and the critic of the state, and never its tool. If the church does not recapture its prophetic zeal, it will become an irrelevant social club without moral or spiritual authority."
This is quoted in a discussion of Rick Warren hosting Obama & McCain at his megachurch.

In reality, there is not one church, there are many, just as there are many faiths. But I do think it good for churches to stand apart from the state, and not just to enforce freedom of religion. Dr King was able to use his place in the pulpit to act against the state because his church was separate from the state. If his church had been a part of the state, it would have lessened his effectiveness.

It also takes buy-in from those not of a church for a church to really sway the state. This is also a good thing. Some "guidance" is pure snake oil. The state eventually had to follow Dr King. I doubt the polititians who supported Jim Jones pre-1978 still do.

(I'm not sure there's a problem with a church being just a social club, though. ;)

baa

Jul. 30th, 2008 12:53 pm
jenk: Faye (Default)
At work, watching tree branches wave in the breeze.

Debating whether to turn off the Twitter->LJ feed that doesn't seem to work regularly anyway.

Try this little quiz that [livejournal.com profile] hollyking posted about....

Thank you for taking the test and for your interest in
state/church separation.

Congratulations! You scored 20 correct out of 21!

  • 18 - 21: Wow! First Amendment Scholar
  • 14 - 17: Congratulations! Better informed than most Americans
  • 10 - 13: Passing Grade
  • 6 - 9: Did you attend a parochial school? Try the test again.
  • 0 - 5: Are you sure you are not a member of the Religious Right?
You are the 28,090th person to take this test since October 12, 2000.
Average score: 12
jenk: Faye (RainInSeattle)
Funny how this sign has been spotted in Yakima but not in Seattle, eh?



Photo from here. According to Rossi's campaign spokeswoman, the sign wasn't created by the campaign and doesn't reflect Rossi's views.

It does seem to me that if some Rossi supporters are trying to get folks in (traditionally D) Seattle* to not vote so that the (traditionally R) Eastern Washingtonians will carry the state, I think they need to change their tactics.


*By Seattle, I suspect they actually mean King, Pierce, and Snohomish counties. These three at "stacked" together in Western Washington (Snohomish to the north, Pierce to the south, and King sandwiched between them). Together they have 48% of the state's population and 6 of the 10 most populous cities in the state. Elections here tend to focus on the big 3 counties vs the rest of the state. Often the tipping point - to either side - is provided by other counties in Western WA or turnout rates.
jenk: Faye (daria esteem)
Oklahoma sex offender registry exposes and executes SQL statements in the URL, enabling downloads of social security numbers, birthdates, addresses, et cetera. Who knows, maybe their site executed INSERT statements too.

Nobody accessing sensitive government databases should assume that users don't know SQL. And yet.
jenk: Faye (DariaPensive)
Dave Patterson, the new Governor of New York, is both the first black governor of NY and the first legally blind governor of any US state.

I think there's a thesis in analyzing which newspapers put which b-word in their headlines...
jenk: Faye (RainInSeattle)
Well, folks, it's that time again.

ETA: The poll has per-party questions because the primary's impact depends on the party. The state D & R parties each determine the method to select delegates to their national conventions; this year the Rs are using the primary to select some delegates and the caucus for others. The Ds are using the caucus only, which means the primary's impact is ... well, depends on who you ask. Some think the Ds' "superdelegates" should use the primary to make their selection.

[Poll #1141145]

(Yes, this is kinda local. Sorry. You can still answer the poll, or if you just want to see the results, you can click the submit button without answering anything.)
jenk: Faye (daria esteem)
[Poll #1135493]
jenk: Faye (RainInSeattle)
Q&A from the Seattle P-I here.

Step by step graphics from the Seattle Times -
Democrat
Republican
Related story here.
jenk: Faye (KittySmile)
Slog has a writeup of how they work. I would also suggest taking a big travel mug of chamomile tea, doodle paper, knitting, or what-have-you to help you relax while you're waiting for things to happen.

Oh, and how to find your caucus location. Both D & R caucus are at 1pm on Saturday Feb 9.
jenk: Faye (RainInSeattle)
This site has a list. It's not totally accurate - WA's caucuses are on 2/9 and the primary is on 2/19*, and 2/19 is on the list - but it's a start.

For WA-state folks:

Democratic caucus info is here.
Republican caucus info is here.

Personally I'm not choosing sides now. Why bother researching candidates when one or more will likely be ruled out by Feb?

*In line with WA's historic pushme-pullyou of "power for the people" vs "power for the parties" the presidential primary was established by initiative in 1989 but the parties can continue to use the caucus results instead of the primary results for delegates. The secretary of state's FAQ on the primary is here.

SAFE Act

Dec. 6th, 2007 12:12 pm
jenk: Faye (SydneyStress)
From C|Net:
This is what the SAFE Act requires: Anyone providing an "electronic communication service" or "remote computing service" to the public who learns about the transmission or storage of information about certain illegal activities or an illegal image must (a) register their name, mailing address, phone number, and fax number with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children's "CyberTipline" and (b) "make a report" to the CyberTipline that (c) must include any information about the person or Internet address behind the suspect activity and (d) the illegal images themselves. (By the way, "electronic communications service" and "remote computing service" providers already have some reporting requirements under existing law too.)
Do they honestly expect hotels and restaurants that provide wifi will hire someone just to snoop on every image crossing the wires? Or could this make it LESS likely that public wifi providers will want to see what's on your monitor?

In response to C|Net's article, ZDNet quotes the bill):
Protection of Privacy- Nothing in this section shall be construed to require an electronic communication service provider or a remote computing service provider to–
  1. monitor any user, subscriber, or customer of that provider;
  2. monitor the content of any communication of any person described in paragraph (1); or
  3. affirmatively seek facts or circumstances described in subsection (a)(2).
Which seems to suggest that "don't look" is the simplest strategy.

Which, um ... why bother writing, passing, etc this bill, then? It does increase the retention requirements on ISPs*. So why have all these other requirements? Is this really going to do any good?

*Requiring ISPs to store TBs of material that could potentially be construed as illegal: helping nerds have access to porn, increasing the barriers of entry to the biz, and violating the privacy of millions. Wow.



Thus far all google results are references to the C|Net article. Will see what else turns up.
jenk: Faye (Default)
Kids asleep in the backseat
We're just counting the miles, you and me
We don't measure the blood we've drawn anymore
We just stack the bodies outside the door

Who'll be the last to die for a mistake
The last to die for a mistake
Whose blood will spill, whose heart will break
Who'll be the last to die, for a mistake

The wise men were all fools, what to do

The sun sets in flames as the city burns
Another day gone down as the night turns
And I hold you here in my heart
As things fall apart

A downtown window flushed with light
Faces of the dead at five
Our martyr's silent eyes
Petition the drivers as we pass by

Who'll be the last to die for a mistake
The last to die for a mistake
Well Darlin' tyrants and kings fall to the same fate
Strung up at your city gates
Who'll be the last to die for a mistake
- Bruce Springsteen
Currently this song is between The Rising (about 9/11) and Long Walk Home in the setlist. No, really?
jenk: Faye (Default)
When the last child cries for a crust of bread
When the last man dies for just words that he said
When there's shelter over the poorest head
We shall be free

When the last thing we notice is the color of skin
And the first thing we look for is the beauty within
When the skies and the oceans are clean again
Then we shall be free

When we're free to love anyone we choose
When this world's big enough for all different views
When we all can worship from our own kind of pew
Then we shall be free
We shall be free

And when money talks for the very last time
And nobody walks a step behind
When there's only one race and that's mankind
Then we shall be free

- From We Shall Be Free by Stephanie Davis & Garth Brooks

YouTube

Profile

jenk: Faye (Default)
jenk

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011 121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 12th, 2025 09:56 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios