HUH?

May. 17th, 2005 10:31 pm
jenk: Faye (read)
[personal profile] jenk
The New York Times has an article about The Case of the Female Orgasm: Bias in the Science of Evolution by Dr EA Lloyd. Dr Lloyd argues that the female orgasm has no evolutionary purpose.
Central to her thesis is the fact that women do not routinely have orgasms during sexual intercourse.

She analyzed 32 studies, conducted over 74 years, of the frequency of female orgasm during intercourse.

When intercourse was "unassisted," that is not accompanied by stimulation of the clitoris, just a quarter of the women studied experienced orgasms often or very often during intercourse, she found.

Five to 10 percent never had orgasms. Yet many of the women became pregnant.

Dr. Lloyd's figures are lower than those of Dr. Alfred A. Kinsey, who in his 1953 book "Sexual Behavior in the Human Female" found that 39 to 47 percent of women reported that they always, or almost always, had orgasm during intercourse.

But Kinsey, Dr. Lloyd said, included orgasms assisted by clitoral stimulation.
Okay, either I'm statistically at one end of the bell curve here or I'm not getting this. Does 'clitoral stimulation' include a partner's body rubbing against you? If so, then how the hell do you have vaginal penetration without clitoral stimulation? Am I somehow overly sexed and I didn't even realize it? [whine] I'm confused....[/whine]

Profile

jenk: Faye (Default)
jenk

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011 121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 7th, 2025 09:12 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios