Oy

Jan. 19th, 2007 01:04 pm
jenk: Faye (Anal-Retentive)
From [livejournal.com profile] noelfigart. I'm tempted to blame it on growing up fundie, but really, it's due to the set of 6 paperbacks my uncle gave me as a child that summarized the Bible in black-and-white comic book form.

You know the Bible 100%!
 

Wow! You are awesome! You are a true Biblical scholar, not just a hearer but a personal reader! The books, the characters, the events, the verses - you know it all! You are fantastic!

Ultimate Bible Quiz
Create MySpace Quizzes

jenk: Faye (GraciousSilence)
Lord Peter:

For those who might be interested in things English (particularly the between-the-Wars period) or Lord Peter Wimsey in particular, the Lord Peter discussion group at Yahoo has started over again with Whose Body. Any who want to discuss the novels (or get more info about what's going on!) may get yourselves over to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LordPeter/ where you may join the discussion. We usually discuss 1 book a month; a third of the book is covered each week, with the last week of the month as wrap-up. (I will be facilitating the wrap-up for the discussion of the second book, Clouds of Witness.)

The Annotated Wimsey also helps in explaining the various subtexts :)

As Sayers' heirs somehow let Whose Body slip out of copyright, there's even a free e-text here.

The Ford Funeral & Episcopal Church Burials:

The Washington Post has a running commentary / blog on President Ford's funeral, including info on the service itself, and links to more details. (You can listen to the funeral (WMP) or download the service leaflet at National Cathedral's website.)

As I didn't know the deceased, I found some of the details more fascinating than I probably would have otherwise. For example, I knew the "Burial Anthems" which begin an Episocopal funeral were from the Gospel according to John, Job, Romans, and Revelations, but NOT that they've been used since 1549. And I didn't know the Commendation originated in the Eastern Orthodox liturgy or that its purpose is to "provide a note of dismissal for the body" for those who can't be present at graveside.

Ah well - back to work :)
jenk: Faye (Grey-HairedCrone)
Part of me thinks "It takes law professors to come up with this". But I recall CS Lewis suggesting something remarkably similar in Mere Christianity:
There ought to be two distinct kinds of marriage: one governed by the State with rules enforced on all citizens, and the other governed by the Church with rules enforced by her on her own members.
Paul Campos' column in the Rocky Mountain News takes this a bit further:
Here's the plan: Civil marriage licenses would continue to be issued by the government [...] Religious marriages, however, would be a different matter.

Let us imagine that John and Jane decide to get married in the Roman Catholic Church. [...] As long as the Catholic Church said John and Jane were still married, they would be considered married by the government.

[...I]f John decided he would prefer to enter into a civil marriage with Jackie (or Jack) rather than remaining married to Jane, he would be allowed to do this only if the Catholic Church agreed to release him from his wedding vows. Until then, he would remain married to Jane, and would continue to bear all the legal obligations created by that marriage.

This might sound like a radical idea, but legally speaking, it is merely the standard way in which we treat most business contracts. [...When] )a business contract lays out a process for arbitrating disputes that arise about the contract's meaning or enforcement, that process must be honored by the courts. Why shouldn't marriage contracts be treated with as much respect?
This is also similar to the idea of "Covenant Marriage" - but with the twist of permitting institutions other than the state to write the initial marriage contract. In Campos' example, the contract is written by the Catholic Church. But why not by a Wiccan coven, for a year and a day? Or (gasp) by the individuals involved? (Well, granted, I'm sure starry-eyed idiots would put in all sorts of stupid stuff, but ...)

And, as Campos points out, this would give the opportunity for those who believe that marriage is a sacred, lifelong bond to act on it. Might be interesting to see if they would. It also would make it clearer that the church and state are separate, which I also think is a good thing. To quote CS Lewis again:
[The question is] how far Christians, if they are voters or Members of Parliament, ought to try to force their views of marriage on the rest of the community by embodying them in the divorce laws. A great many people seem to think that if you are a Christian yourself you should try to make divorce difficult for every one. I do not think that. At least I know I should be very angry if the Mohammendans tried to prevent the rest of us from drinking wine.
(Andrew Sullivan discusses CS Lewis' take on church, state, and marriage here).
jenk: Faye (Meditation)
Yesterday a conversation touched briefly on perfectionism: how being hyperaware of one's faults can hamstring all action.

Today I noticed a book I haven't looked at in years. And I found the following piece:

Forgive
You did the best you could with who you were and what you knew at the time. As soon as you learned something better, you did that.

So why can't you forgive yourself and others for past mistakes?

For some people, punishment is not enough, atonement insufficient, retribution never satisfying. They wallow in guilt. They refuse to forgive themselves or others. They lose the future because they are trapped in the past.

Search out the painful mistakes in your past and prepare a certificate of forgiveness, complete with a gold seal for each one. ... ) Give one to yourself: "I'm not perfect.... I made a mistake..."

Create your certificates, forgive yourself. Then, sit down, relax, breathe deeply.

Let go of the guilt, let go of the past, breathe in the present and stay open to your future.

~ From Windows, by Jennifer James.

Oh, My.

Oct. 4th, 2006 03:26 pm
jenk: Faye (read)
[livejournal.com profile] alg pointed out that a friend of hers has a band called Draco and The Malfoys. Who reference Harry and The Potters. They're in Wikipedia too. You can hear some of the songs on My Space.

Oh dear. This is frighteningly listenable.
jenk: Faye (StainedGlassAngel)
from Saturday's NY Times:
About the book _Up, Up, and Oy Vey!_ ) The volume, which has nearly sold out its first run of 5,000 copies, contends that writer-artists of the classic comics, many of them Jewish, were influenced by their religious heritage in devising characters and plots. ... )

In the early 60’s, when he developed the character known as the Thing as part of the Fantastic Four, Mr. Kirby gave the bricklike being a human past as Benjamin Jacob Grimm, using his and his father’s Jewish names, and a tough childhood on Yancy Street, a thinly veiled version of the real Delancey Street.

For his home, Mr. Kirby even made a drawing of the Thing wearing a yarmulke and a prayer shawl.

Along with those examples of Judaic influence, “Up, Up, and Oy Vey!” offers instances like the name of Superman’s father, Jor-El, with “el” being the suffix to many biblical names and the common use of masks and false identities, akin to the heroine Esther in the Purim story, who goes by an alias in Persian society.

Trying not to overreach, Rabbi Weinstein cut out a passage that likened Batman’s bat cave to the Machpelah, the so-called Cave of the Patriarchs in Hebron, where the Bible says Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Sarah, Rebecca and Leah are buried.

“Simcha,” he says aloud to himself, “the night you wrote that, you had too much Starbucks.”

In the months since publication, the book has brought Rabbi Weinstein invitations to book fairs, Jewish events and comics conventions in places like San Diego and London.

And it has given him what all rabbis worry about and plan for at this time of year, a sermon topic for Yom Kippur. On the Day of Atonement, Rabbi Weinstein said, he will be preaching about the Thing.
jenk: Faye (Default)
It's a poem by Robert Frost, and the source of 'Home is the place where, when you have to go there, / They have to take you in.'

I read the full poem for the first time today, and these passages stood out to me.
He hates to see a boy the fool of books.
Poor Silas, so concerned for other folk,
And nothing to look backward to with pride,
And nothing to look forward to with hope,
So now and never any different.'
And nothing to look backward to with pride / And nothing to look forward to with hope

God, that's lonely.
Silas is what he is -- we wouldn't mind him--
But just the kind that kinsfolk can't abide.
He never did a thing so very bad.
He don't know why he isn't quite as good
As anyone.

It's just...ow. This reminds me of Certain Women: "Look, Em, you're bright. And Billy's not. That's something you can't understand. I mean, it's simply not possible for highly intelligent people to understand people who are not." There are times when understanding isn't enough, when differences are too huge. And it's hard.
jenk: Faye (DariaPensive)
This is from a book by Jennifer James, most commonly known as a pop anthropologist/psychologist:
When I was teaching at the university, a talented young student informed me one day that she could be doing what I was doing. I agreed with her and suggested she enter graduate school. She said that wasn't fair; she should be able to do it without credentials because she was just as smart as I was. Why should she have to wait when I was already there?
James was professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at the University of Washington Medical School for twelve years; presumably this occurred during those years, tho it may have been before she was a full professor. Either way, I seriously doubt that an undergrad could walk into the job and do it just as well. Tho I doubt she thought of it that way; it's easy to look at someone else and think, "oh, that's easy" and not realize what the full scope of the job is. Also, a lot of people think in terms of "I should be given job X because I want it", not "I can do job X well because of my experience with ____ and skills at _____, as demonstrated by ______".
Dreaming is wonderful; wishing is okay; but "if only" is a way of saying "never". It is an attitude that focuses on what you lack, on what others have, and that makes it difficult to care about yourself as you are.
For years I didn't get how "if only" relates to making "it difficult to care about yourself as you are". Now, I think I do: if you don't like yourself or see your potential, then why invest in yourself? When you're thinking "if only I'd win the lottery" or "if only I'd taken that warehouse job at Amazon before it went public" then you don't have to actually DO anything. You're off the hook. It's up to someone else - parents, God, friends, the Universe - to produce ....

It may be that the extra money or status or whatever would not give you what you really want; and if you don't like yourself, working on becoming someone you like is probably more important. But
[if you are] clear that more money and status would significantly add to the quality of your life, then go for it. Decide what you want to earn or do; list the sacrifices you will have to make (time, relationships, other activities, personal change); and make a plan. Read, study, question, and start building capital. [...] Accept full responsibility for doing it yourself. [...] Any money or status that comes through others (male or female) has strings attached and trades that must be made.
I can remember reading that years ago and feeling exhausted at the thought. But I also found it a useful way to think through whether I really wanted to do the work ... or not ... tho the things I did decide to do, I did one step at a time ... it seems a lot easier that way.

Quotes are from "I Want Their Money, Status, and Security" from Women And The Blues
jenk: Faye (read)
"No-one would remember the Good Samaritan if he'd only had good intentions; he had money as well." - Margaret Thatcher, in January of 1980.

And yes, the Good Samaritan had the money to arrange to arrange for the injured man to be cared for at an inn. He also, apparently, had the skill to give first aid.

This reminded me of a story from Following Francis. At age 17 the author dropped out of college to live in a commune and serve "the poor". Of course, being inexperienced & uneducated, she didn't have much to offer "the poor". She had relieved her middle-class guilt of having more than others, but didn't accomplish much.
jenk: Faye (knowing)
[After 9/11], a lot of people spoke of waking up to the fact that life offers no guarantees, and they vowed not to continue taking their lives and loved ones for granted. But why were they asleep in the first place? People die suddenly every day; why did it take planes flying into buildings to realize that the spouse they fought with this morning might not come home tonight?

- from Following Francis: The Franciscan Way for Everyone by Susan Pitchford
This is one of the reasons I'm reluctant to work late every night or weekends. Work is important, but so is the rest of my life - and it may not wait.
jenk: Faye (daria smile)
I thought these were pretty good. I am trying not to give spoilers, but if you follow the links you may get some - at least for Blue Moon & onward.
On her education:
My degree in biology is probably one of the main reasons my "monsters" seem so real. I start with real animals for my were-animals. I try to use as much "real" science as I can.
On using real people as characters:
I do not use real people as characters. I'm superstitious. Bad things happen in my books. What if I killed someone off and then a few days later the person I based the character on also died horribly.
Anita's genesis:
Out of college, I started reading a lot of hard-boiled detective fiction [with both male and female protagonists.] The men got to cuss, the women rarely; the men got to kill people and not feel bad about it, if the women killed someone they had to feel really, really bad about it afterward and it had to be an extreme situation; the men got to have sex, often and on stage and very casually, but if the women had sex it had to be off stage, very sanitized and they had to feel guilty about it afterwards. I thought this was unfair.
- in The SF Site
On research:
When I did Guilty Pleasures [I interviewed a policeman.] Asking about ghouls in a cemetery raiding graves, I said ‘I know that in real life that doesn’t happen,’ and he got the strangest look on his face. And he said, ‘People have teeth too.’ He had been called to cemeteries where people had raided graves and done pretty much what I was writing about, except not as thoroughly. That was the moment I realized that anything I’ll ever come up with on paper has already been done. Once you take out the magic system or the stuff that won’t work with physics as we know it, I cannot invent anything they haven’t already done."
- from Locus Online
Advice for new writers?
You mean I have to, like, write? )
On sex scenes
... ) For five books and every crime scene, the camera had never flinched. So what did that say about me that when it came time to have sex on paper I wanted to flinch? It says I’m very American. We’re fine with violence; sex makes us uncomfortable.

Jean-Claude had been a ladies man for over 400 years. And he’s French. After five books of buildup, it had to be good. That first scene was the hardest.
On writing about multiple partners:
For research, I interviewed some households that have three people in a “couple.”
- from St Louis Post-Dispatch
jenk: Faye (read)
This is from To Set Our Hope On Christ (PDF), the Episcopal Church's explanation of "how a person living in a same gender union may be considered eligible to lead the flock of Christ."
From the beginning, Scripture was seen as complex and contested: two creation stories; two rival accounts of how Israel got its first king; the argument of the Deuteronomist that the good are always rewarded and the bad always punished countered by Job; the argument against taking foreign wives in Ezra and Nehemiah countered by Ruth; the argument for exclusivism countered by traditions of inclusion in Second Isaiah and Jonah. Scripture itself corrected and amended earlier versions of scripture in some cases; in other cases, rival arguments were allowed to stand side by side unresolved. The idea that there is only one correct way to read or interpret scripture is a rather modern idea. ... )

We confess that at times we have acted as though the Church has never argued about its doctrines and practices, has never changed its mind; as if “the Scriptures are perfectly clear and do not need interpretation” or that “all reasonable people will agree” with us. We confess that even though we know this is untrue, and even though the quickest glance at the history of biblical interpretation of ethical issues demonstrates its falsity, we persist in acting as if all Christians could agree on complex matters. We mention, for examples, such issues as the right use of creation, whether Christians can lend money at interest to other Christians (usury), whether slavery is justified or not, the use of force and violence, abortion, the death penalty, war, contraception, the nature of marriage, the property rights of women, child labor laws, prison systems, how many languages should be taught in schools, whether evolution should be taught in schools, and many other questions in which the Church’s appropriation of Scripture has been complex and in many cases even at odds with the most obvious sense of the biblical text.
- from paragraphs 2.4 & 2.12
Amen.
jenk: Faye (KittySmile)
From her site:

Seattle
Friday June 16
Saturday June 17
  • Third Place Books, drop-by signing, 2:00 PM
    (Jen's note: not listed on the 3rd Place calendar; hence the "drop-by")
  • Bailey Coy Books, 7:00 PM (This will take place at The Wild Rose Bar, 1021 E. Pike Street, Seattle 206.324.9210 )
According to her blog, Alison's been using a projector to show the art as she reads aloud (picture). I'm not sure she'll do it at Third Place, but I would think she would at U Books & Wild Rose. Sounds like it's going to be good...
jenk: Faye (maggie)
I found an online copy of the 2004 New Yorker profile of Madeleine L'Engle. In some ways it was a bit shocking to see that many members of L'Engle's family disagree with her memoirs.
L'Engle's family habitually refer to all her memoirs as "pure fiction," and, conversely, consider her novels to be the most autobiographical — though to them equally invasive — of her books.
I'd wondered from where in L'Engle's experience she drew the various serial wives of Certain Women or the arrangements in A Severed Wasp. Not that she can't make things up, mind, she certainly does, but ... there are things that experience vastly helps with.
jenk: Faye (read)
FUN HOME ALISON BECHDEL As a little girl, Bechdel knew that her father, an English teacher in small-town Pennsylvania, was odd. He was withdrawn, he decorated their house too much, he moonlighted as an undertaker. But she didn't realize he was gay and seducing his young students, and she certainly didn't expect him to kill himself at 44 years old. In this brilliant, bleakly hilarious memoir in comic-book form, Bechdel combines stories from her emotionally barren but weirdly fascinating childhood with elegant allusions to Proust and Joyce to make a gripping story of filial sleuthery and, in the end, hard-earned acceptance of how much of her father she finds in herself.
Source: Time Magazine
I read it Wednesday & will probably dip back into it this weekend. Very worth the hardcover price.
jenk: Faye (wedding)
  1. "Want to have dinner tonight?" "Sure!".
  2. Evenings of laughter, wine, new perfumes, and [livejournal.com profile] jw1776's pizza.
  3. [livejournal.com profile] jw1776 arranging a spa visit for my birthday :)
  4. I haven't lost my touch at massage.
  5. Snuggles.
  6. Found a place to order the 4th Leonard & Larry book.
  7. Getting to smile at a chandelier I haven't seen in a while.
  8. Waking up to a clean sink.
  9. New warm-weather robe.
  10. Friends and chosen family.

Weekend

Apr. 24th, 2006 10:33 pm
jenk: Faye (eyes)
...or the last few days, however you want to think of it...

Thursday I met up with [livejournal.com profile] jw1776, [livejournal.com profile] dianthus and [livejournal.com profile] skydancer for dinner at the Old Spaghetti Factory. Then off to Starbucks' and the Grind. [livejournal.com profile] skydancer and I had planned to leave by 10:30, so [livejournal.com profile] dianthus naturally planned to ride home with [livejournal.com profile] jw1776. As it turned out, [livejournal.com profile] jw1776 and [livejournal.com profile] dianthus were home before we were...

Friday: [livejournal.com profile] jw1776 called me around 2pm. "Hey, would you like a massage and a facial tonight to celebrate your birthday? And maybe dinner somewhere special?" Well...YES. I was a bit confused since my birthday is next weekend, but [livejournal.com profile] jw1776 explained that this way it's a surprise. My back didn't feel up to a facial bed, but the massage & steam bath were marvelous. :)

Saturday I vegged while [livejournal.com profile] loba and [livejournal.com profile] jw1776 went shopping. I got the follow-up call I've been expecting from a "family services" person at Evergreen-Washelli asking about how we're doing, did I have any feedback on how they handled Mom's cremation and memorial, and oh, had we thought about making plans to join Mom and Dad eventually, and you know, we really should have a cremation trust account setup since insurance and so on often aren't available until much later...sigh. I demured and went back to my book. I did laundry, but that was the extent of my productiveness. I did have brunch with [livejournal.com profile] skydancer before he went to work. Later we had dinner and went to Tubs ;) Once I got home I somehow became busy...doing dishes, cleaning the bathroom, and so on.

Sunday, well...I am no longer in the clique that had not read The Da Vinci Code. As for the "incredible un-Christian relevations" within, the only one new to me was may be TMI ). We also did dim sum with [livejournal.com profile] dianthus and homemade pizza with [livejournal.com profile] skydancer.

And today, well, back to work. But [livejournal.com profile] jw1776 got me Vermonty Python.
jenk: Faye (eyes)
  1. You loaned me some of your Anita Blake books to underscore your relationship with the Episcopalian church. What are other books that you use to help explain facets of your personality or life?
  2. Read more... )

  3. We've yet to take each other up on pairing up for workshops. What sort are you interested in attending?

    Read more... )

  4. What do you think of cuisines like Indian, Greek, Persian, Afgahni, Thai, Ethiopian, etc.?

    Read more... )

  5. What things have you coded for fun rather than for pay?

    Read more... )

  6. At a game night, what's your favorite game to play and why?

    Read more... )
If anyone wants me to interview them, say so here, and I'll give you 5 questions to answer in your LJ.
jenk: Faye (lilo)
Monday's Deb Price column talks about Jack Rodgers, a Presbyterian minister who agreed to serve on a local task force to consider the question of ordaining gays and lesbians in 1993. He expected that he would be a voice against gay ordination on the task force. Instead, he came to advocate ordaining lesbians and gays and celebrating gay marriages in the church. He also wrote a book on how studying the Bible changed his beliefs: Jesus, the Bible, And Homosexuality: Explode the Myths, Heal the Church.
jenk: Faye (Default)
Thinking about finding a church closer to home.

Filling the windowsill of my cube (yes, I have a window cube now) with origami critters. Whale, dragon, guppy, ladybug, frog, swan, and today's pig. Also a cube, ninja star, b-ball hoop, and church.

Read the new Mrs Murphy book Sour Puss. Spotted the murderer 1/2 through but had the motive wrong. Re-read the one before the last (when Murphy's human quit her job) to remind me of the recent changes....re-reading the last one now.

Browsing [livejournal.com profile] dark_christian. Did you know that excessive eye contact is "optical intercourse", a sin worthy of expulsion? Or that Tom DeLay is no longer House Majority Leader because he's a Christian? Fascinating.

Went shopping this weekend with [livejournal.com profile] cyberangel_. Wow, in addition to the 70s earth-tones and ruffles, they've added the faux peasant look and gauchos. As one page puts it, "Really good this one didn't last."

I'm glad [livejournal.com profile] jeliza got Happy Pill back online. As she put it, "The Happy Pill project examines and parodies the gender roles and tropes of modern advertising. The project culminated in my graduation show from Photographic Center Northwest, and consisted of a large installation, creating a faux meeting room for the advertising agency of a parallel universe."

Did laundry & some rearranging in the garden yesterday. Funny how easy it is to pick up a 5-lb rock, and how sore I feel the next day after moving 30 or so of them...

If anyone reading this didn't know, my mom died the last day of February. Overall I'm doing okay, tho I'm still adjusting. Of course, now I'm adjusting to the time change too.

Profile

jenk: Faye (Default)
jenk

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011 121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 23rd, 2025 03:59 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios