Money QOTD

May. 3rd, 2007 11:30 pm
jenk: Faye (Money)
"Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pound ought and six, result misery."
-- Charles Dickens in David Copperfield
jenk: Faye (read)
[livejournal.com profile] lisakit posted a question about "The Secret". My reply noted the sort of folks I thought it was targeting (hint: have disposable income*) ~ but that for someone whose life is really not working, more practical advice would likely be more useful.

Some books I came up with for examples were:

  1. Leaving Home Survival Guide. Finding an apartment, fixing it up, cleaning it, negotiating with landlords, roommates, bosses, coworkers, and the government, and a few kitchen basics.
  2. Everything Women Always Wanted to Know About Cars (But Didn't Know Who To Ask). What's really up under the hood, how to check the fluids & change the oil - and why those are useful things.
  3. Real Life 101: A Guide To Stuff That Actually Matters. I was looking for another "basic life skills", and this one includes finding a job, an apartment, health care, transportation, and so on.
  4. Job Hunting for Dummies. If you what you've done in the past isn't working for you, it doesn't hurt to try....
  5. Cooking Basics for Dummies. The goal is to learn enough that you can eat in without giving yourself scurvy or ptomaine poisoning.
  6. Personal Finance for Dummies. Figuring out what you have, what to do with it, and how to take care of it. (This book was my main guide for getting out of debt, actually.)
  7. Unofficial Guide to Beating Debt. This gets more in detail on dealing with debt - including negotiating with creditors and when (and when not) to go through bankruptcy.
  8. Spend Well, Live Rich: How to Get What You Want with the Money You Have. It's all about using your head. On clothes: "If it's on your ass, it's not an asset!" On dating: "It's okay to say: 'Honey, I love you and everything, but if you need money, ask your mama.'" In general: "Is this a need or is it a want?" and "Enough is enough."
  9. The Complete Tightwad Gazette. The tagline of the newsletter was "Promoting thrift as a viable alternative lifestyle", but it's really about cutting down where you want to so that you can splurge on the things you really want - in the author's case, a big, old-fashioned house with attached barn and six kids.
Moving a bit up Maslow's heirarchy, there's:

  1. The Good Vibrations Guide to Sex. From anatomy, communication, & masturbation to outercourse & intercourse to fantasies & bdsm, this book covers the stuff that should be taught everywhere.
  2. Women and the Blues as a general help-me-get-unstuck book.
  3. For pregnancy and motherhood, I'd suggest the Girlfriends' Guide series.


I've read most of these; the others (3, 4, 5, & 7) look good from Amazon's info. Any thoughts on other books along this line? What would you give to someone moving out on her own, or want to throw at your unemployable cousin, or have helped you to get yourself together?

*Enough to buy a book. Doesn't need to be more.

tax update

Mar. 29th, 2007 10:21 am
jenk: Faye (hunterPerky)
The $1 check has been cashed.

I am tempted to order a copy for framing.
jenk: Faye (GeekGirl)
Today was the recheck-with-a-fresh-mind. I also made use of an online version of TurboTax, which had pros & cons. details )

The Bottom Line: We owe $1.
jenk: Faye (eyes)
I confirmed we have W2s, 1099s, 1098, and related info a few days ago.
I have cookies, diet Pepsi, and music.
I made IRA contributions for both of us.

6:20 update:
Schedule b done.
Made a pot of Tahitian Blend.
Starting on schedule d.
music: Michelle Dockrey, "Mal's Song"

7:00 update:
note to self )
Music: Mary Chapin Carpenter, "River"

7:15 update:
Working on schedule A.
(For locals - King county has property tax info online - easy to look up :)
Music: Mary Chapin Carpenter, "This Is Me Leaving You"

7:30 update:
[livejournal.com profile] skydancer is here
Also for locals: WA Local and State Sales Tax Summary
Music: Ozzy Osbourne, "Mama, I'm Coming Home"

7:50 update:
[livejournal.com profile] dianthus is also here
Done with first draft - will check it over with a fresh mind before sending it in.
Music: Melissa Etheridge, "The Boy Feels Strange"

money duh

Mar. 6th, 2007 05:22 pm
jenk: Faye (Money)
I remember Mom saying, "Well, when you're a grown-up you can buy what you want."

So now I feel I should be able to buy what I want, even though I know intellectually that a) I can't afford EVERYTHING and b) I don't have a place to PUT it all.

To-do: reprogram self for "Well, when you're a grown-up you can DECIDE which to buy." Much healthier.
jenk: Faye (Money)
from an article on "the middle class crunch" by Liz Pulliam Weston:
A decent job is no longer an easy ticket to a middle-class life. It's not just that things like health care and pensions are disappearing; it's that they're disappearing at the same time as our expectations about our lives have risen. [...]

If we define [middle class] solely by income, then according to the U.S. Census Bureau, a household income of $36,000 to $57,657 in 2005 landed you squarely in the middle class. [...] Of course, there are plenty of problems with using income figures, most notably because income alone doesn't reflect the huge variation in living costs across the U.S. [...]

A more flexible definition for middle class would be having the resources to cover all your needs and some of your wants, plus the ability to save for the future.
I think it's telling that she specifies "some of your wants", not "all of your wants" - as she notes a bit later in the article:
[T]rying to look like you're middle class may well doom your prospects to actually be middle class.
Maybe I've watched too much TV, but I know I fall into the "well why can't I have this thing that I want", and don't check how the individual things all add up...
jenk: Faye (Money)
from The Wall Street Journal:

In the United Kingdom, online gambling will be regulated and -- more importantly -- taxed, beginning in 2007. It is as easy for a would-be bettor to reach a gambling Web site in Athens, Greece, as one in Athens, Ga.

Indeed, the U.S. government's assertion that interstate Internet gambling is illegal has provoked an international trade fight. In March 2004, the World Trade Organization ruled the U.S. had violated global trade pacts by banning offshore firms from offering U.S. citizens some forms of Internet gambling -- notably sports betting -- while providing exceptions for U.S. companies that offer horse betting and state-run Internet lotteries. The U.S. says it has the right to ban imports that may be found morally objectionable.
(emphasis added)
jenk: Faye (MoandSyd)
That's the title of this article by Ben Stein on the Nazi's former euthanasia center in Hadamar, Germany, which killed persons "with mental diseases, with retardation, with vaguely defined 'antisocial tendencies,' which could include being divorced too often, changing jobs too often, drinking too much, or, of course, being Jewish or 'Negro' or Gypsy".

Why?

[The Nazis] believed there would inevitably be shortages of food, and it should not be wasted on so-called undesirables, including mentally retarded people (who supposedly tended to reproduce much faster than careful, prudent Aryans of good mental health) and unemployed vagabonds, who were portrayed as weighing heavily on the shoulders of the German working man. [...]

The logic was simple: Fewer “useless eaters,” more food for the Reich. Exhausted forced laborers from Russia and the Balkan states were killed there for the same reasons.

Contrasting this corruption of Malthusian economics with American thinking, Stein states:

[T]he great glory of America is that our economics has always been based on the idea that abundance is the natural order of things, interrupted only by the Great Depression.... If there is always plenty, there is plenty to go around. No one need be killed for others to thrive. [...]

We have not had to face genuine scarcity in North America since at least 1940. We have certainly never had a generational crisis comparable to the one that is coming in Medicare. What will happen down the road?

Frankly, I don’t know. But the economics of Hadamar stands grimly as a reminder of what not to do. In the cemetery at Hadamar there is a stark obelisk on which is written, in German, “Man, respect mankind.”

Stein also calls for Americans to "make some economic policy plans" so that abundance continues. I don't disagree. The main thing I see is to raise the retirement age to reflect longer lives (Life expectancy is 50 percent higher just since the 1930s, when Social Security was created.)
jenk: Faye (knowing)
There can be wide variations in how much property owners are taxed in various cities, King County Assessor Scott Noble says. Read more... )

The differences are a result of the public will and taxing districts. Voter approval of various measures — school levies and hospitals bonds, for example — account for about 40 percent of a property owner's tax bill.

Then each county can have more than 100 taxing districts related to its community services — water districts, school districts, fire districts, etc. — and each will want its slice of the property-tax pie.

That's why what a property owner pays "depends on where they live — there are different rates for different parts of the county," Noble said.

And because taxing districts can overlap, King County alone has 268 total property-tax levy rates.
Source: Home Forum column
So the property tax (pdf) rate varies depending on where you live. And the assessed value varies depending on many factors...of which location is a biggie. According to the state's website, "[t]here are approximately 3,300 unique Tax Code Areas in the state of Washington."
jenk: Faye (Money)
Saw this Newsweek article on "Why Welfare Reform Worked". What I found interesting was the information on poverty rates.
The poverty rate among blacks has fallen sharply, though it's still discouragingly high. From 1968 to 1994 it barely budged, averaging 32.4 percent. By 2000 it was 22.5 percent. (The poverty rate is the share of people living below the government's poverty line, about $19,500 for a family of four in 2004.) Similarly, there have been big drops in child poverty. Since 1989 the number of children in poverty has fallen 12 percent for non-Hispanic whites and 14 percent for blacks [... E]ven after the 2001 recession, many poverty rates stayed well below previous levels. For all blacks, it was 24.7 percent in 2004. [...also since 1991] the teen birthrate has dropped by a third. The mothers least capable of supporting children have had fewer of them.
The article also notes that poverty hasn't been eliminated, and in fact there is one major ethnic or racial group that has more children in poverty now than 15 years ago. Which? Latinos. The author considers this a side affect of the large number of Latino illegal immigrants.

Now, what I found interesting here was the author's focus on black poverty rates. What, only blacks are on welfare? Looking at census info (I <3 google) I found the following:

Number of people below the poverty level
(in thousands)
% of total % change
White, not Hispanic 1991 17,741 9.4% -8.5%
2004 16,870 8.6%
Black 1991 10,242 32.7% -24.5%
2004 9,000 24.7%
Asian 1991 996 13.8% -29.0%
2004 1,303 9.8%
Hispanic (of any race) 1991 6,339 28.7% -23.7%
2004 9,132 21.9%
All Races 1991 35,708 14.2% -10.6%
2004 36,997 12.7%


Being the anal person I am, I added up the numbers of folk in poverty and got slightly smaller numbers than in the "All Races" table. I expected this - with numbers "in thousands", rounding tends to happen, and the notation "(of any race)" implies there may be some double-counting.

I noticed that, according to these numbers, the poverty rates have gone down for each group. Better, the absolute number of blacks & whites below the poverty line have gone down - despite an overall increase population-wise! But it was when I caculated the change rate that it got interesting. Each racial group has had the percent of people living below the poverty line decrease by over 20% - except whites. Why not mention that? Fear of looking racist? The percent of asians below the poverty line has gone down by 29%, the largest change of the 4 groups. Granted, asians are the smallest of the four groups, but still: Why does the article not mention asians at all?
jenk: Faye (DariaPensive)
This is from a book by Jennifer James, most commonly known as a pop anthropologist/psychologist:
When I was teaching at the university, a talented young student informed me one day that she could be doing what I was doing. I agreed with her and suggested she enter graduate school. She said that wasn't fair; she should be able to do it without credentials because she was just as smart as I was. Why should she have to wait when I was already there?
James was professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at the University of Washington Medical School for twelve years; presumably this occurred during those years, tho it may have been before she was a full professor. Either way, I seriously doubt that an undergrad could walk into the job and do it just as well. Tho I doubt she thought of it that way; it's easy to look at someone else and think, "oh, that's easy" and not realize what the full scope of the job is. Also, a lot of people think in terms of "I should be given job X because I want it", not "I can do job X well because of my experience with ____ and skills at _____, as demonstrated by ______".
Dreaming is wonderful; wishing is okay; but "if only" is a way of saying "never". It is an attitude that focuses on what you lack, on what others have, and that makes it difficult to care about yourself as you are.
For years I didn't get how "if only" relates to making "it difficult to care about yourself as you are". Now, I think I do: if you don't like yourself or see your potential, then why invest in yourself? When you're thinking "if only I'd win the lottery" or "if only I'd taken that warehouse job at Amazon before it went public" then you don't have to actually DO anything. You're off the hook. It's up to someone else - parents, God, friends, the Universe - to produce ....

It may be that the extra money or status or whatever would not give you what you really want; and if you don't like yourself, working on becoming someone you like is probably more important. But
[if you are] clear that more money and status would significantly add to the quality of your life, then go for it. Decide what you want to earn or do; list the sacrifices you will have to make (time, relationships, other activities, personal change); and make a plan. Read, study, question, and start building capital. [...] Accept full responsibility for doing it yourself. [...] Any money or status that comes through others (male or female) has strings attached and trades that must be made.
I can remember reading that years ago and feeling exhausted at the thought. But I also found it a useful way to think through whether I really wanted to do the work ... or not ... tho the things I did decide to do, I did one step at a time ... it seems a lot easier that way.

Quotes are from "I Want Their Money, Status, and Security" from Women And The Blues
jenk: Faye (Money)
From local business columnist Bill Virgin:
Owning a sports franchise is like buying a Monet painting. The immediate payoff is psychological, not financial; in fact, ownership is likely to be a financial drain. A work of art doesn't pay interest; it does generate expenses for security, insurance and preservation. The financial payoff comes when it's sold -- if a buyer can be found who is willing to pay more than the original purchase price and accumulated losses.

In other words, the Greater Fool Theory....

As long as an owner has confidence the pool of Greater Fools has not been drained, the issue becomes whether there's enough psychological benefit from owning a team, a house, or a Monet to put up with the losses -- and the wallet is thick enough to endure them. The former Sonics ownership group decided the trade-off wasn't worth it, especially when a live one showed up on the doorstep, checkbook in hand.
Some toys get sold on ebay. Others are given to friends or relatives...and still more just sit on the mantel or in a closet. NBA franchises don't usually go on ebay, but they don't necessarily do well when ignored, either. Sports franchises are businesses that employ a bunch of people, so an owner's blind eye can boomerang into problems with the IRS, L&I, creditors, landlords, and the like. Much better to sell if you aren't going to spend time and energy on it.

Well, unless you have a management structure you trust.

A lot.
jenk: Faye (working)
From a NY Times article on differences between women and men in college:
"I think women feel more pressure to achieve," said Christina Thompson, a political science major who plans to go to law school.

Right, said her youngest sister.

"In the past, black women in the South couldn't do much except clean, pick cotton or take care of someone's children," Lynette Thompson said. "I think from our mother we got the feeling we should try to use the opportunities that are available to us now."

They and many other women at Greensboro say it is not bad to be on a campus with twice as many women as men because it encourages them to stick to their studies without the distraction of dating.
Wow. I knew I didn't care about dating in college - and considered a school without greeks a bonus - because after school, homework, work, and general life management I knew I'd rather veg or hang out with a friend than have to fuss over my clothes and Act Nice for some stranger. Apparently the tradition is continuing, at least in some places.
In freshman women, educators worry about eating disorders and perfectionism. But among the freshman men, the problems stem mostly from immaturity.

"There was so much freedom when I got here, compared to my very structured high school life, that I kept putting things off," said Greg Williams, who just finished his freshman year. "I wouldn't do much work and I played a lot of Halo. I didn't know how to wake up on time without a mom. I had laundry problems. I shrank all my clothes and had to buy new ones."
Interesting examples. Personally, I would think eating disorders and perfectionism to be related to immaturity and lack of self-confidence. I know I lost a lot of my perfectionism when I decided I could choose my battles and set my own measures of acceptable achievement. (Not that I don't pay attention to, say, measures set by work - but largely so I can be sure they're compatible.)

This quote got me thinking:
[Ms. Smyers] recently ended a relationship with another student, in part out of frustration over his playing video games four hours a day.

"He said he was thinking of trying to cut back to 15 hours a week," she said. "I said, 'Fifteen hours is what I spend on my internship, and I get paid $1,300 a month.' That's my litmus test now: I won't date anyone who plays video games. It means they're choosing to do something that wastes their time and sucks the life out of them."
Ouch. Y'know, it has occurred to me that ripping ivy out of the back yard would probably irritate my carpal tunnel less than mousing....

And some notes on the "boys crisis in education": It's not just gender. It's class, gender, race, and probably six other things. ) ...and I've finished my tea. Back to work :)
jenk: Faye (knowing)
From "Money Changes Everything" in the New York Times:
[A former lawyer working on] her M.F.A. in creative writing at Columbia [found] her diamond engagement ring attracted particular attention from her new group of friends. "When I was working," she said, "I never thought about the ring, it seemed unremarkable."

But at school, she said, "People said things like, 'That's a really big diamond,' and not necessarily in a complimentary way." So she began taking off the ring before class.
-o- )
"We are allegedly a classless society, and that's obviously completely untrue, but people don't want to acknowledge that those differences exist," said Jamie Johnson, a 26-year-old heir to the Johnson & Johnson fortune.

-o-
"The real issue is not money itself, but the power money gives you," said Dalton Conley, a professor of sociology and the director of the Center for Advanced Social Science Research at New York University, who studies issues of wealth and class. "Money makes explicit the inequalities in a relationship, so we work hard to minimize it as a form of tact."
-o- )
"I call them 'money pods,' " [said Suze Orman]. "Look at a group of female friends walking down the street. They're often all dressed identically: the same shoes, the same belts, the same handbag."

But what is not easily apparent, Ms. Orman said, is that one of the women may have saved for months to buy her one expensive handbag, or more likely, put it on her credit card. Her identically dressed friends, meanwhile, may have the salary or the family money to afford a closet full of designer purses.

"That is how we get in trouble," Ms. Orman said. "We think our friends are just like us, and if our friend can afford something, we fool ourselves into thinking we can afford it, too."
-o- )

heh heh heh

May. 5th, 2006 12:19 pm
jenk: Faye (mmm...)
jenk: Faye (daria smile)
In the early 1980's, an I.R.S. research officer in Washington named John Szilagyi had seen enough random audits to know that some taxpayers were incorrectly claiming dependents for the sake of an exemption. Sometimes it was a genuine mistake (a divorced wife and husband making duplicate claims on their children), and sometimes the claims were comically fraudulent (Szilagyi recalls at least one dependent's name listed as Fluffy, who was quite obviously a pet rather than a child).

Szilagyi decided that the most efficient way to clean up this mess was to simply require taxpayers to list their children's Social Security numbers. [...] Szilagyi's idea was [put] into law for tax year 1986. When the returns started coming in the following April, Szilagyi recalls, he and his bosses were shocked: seven million dependents had suddenly vanished from the tax rolls, some incalculable combination of real pets and phantom children. Szilagyi's clever twist generated nearly $3 billion in revenues in a single year.
Source: New York Times Magazine article by Stephen J. Dubner and Steven D. Levitt, authors of Freakonomics; emphasis mine. ;)
jenk: Faye (jen36)
In response to an observation of growing up in whitebread America - no racism but no other races, either

I grew up in a bit north of Seattle, what is now the city of Shoreline. When I was in school it was about 10% Asian, 1-2% black, and the rest white or mixed (and most of the mixes were white & Asian). The 2000 census reports it was 77% white, 13% Asian, and 2.8% black.

So. Yes, people of other races. But damned few, even in service positions. And those few I met at school were usually 2nd or 3rd-generation Americans being raised by smart, well-educated, frequently well-to-do (at least to my eyes) parents. Then I went to work at Microsoft Redmond, with its large Asian minority (new immigrants as well as nth-generation), almost everyone comes from one side of the IQ bell curve and most are being paid high-tech wages.

Results?
  • I expect people of other races to be as smart or smarter than I and to have as much or more money.
  • I do not equate "accent" with "ignorant".
  • I do not equate "brown skin" with "accent".
  • I did not pick up my mother's assumption that people of color are less educated or poor. This baffled her.
  • I did pick up some of mom's BS, largely her discomfort with being emotionally close to people who look different (black, Asian, Latino, noticably richer or poorer).
  • I am aware of racial differences. I wonder if I would be less aware if I had grown up in a more-mixed community.
  • I wonder if my ignorance leads me to racist assumptions.
FWIW, according to the 2000 census info, King County is 75.7% white, 10.8% Asian, and 5.4% black. The rest is mostly mixed, with some Pacific Islander & Native American thrown in. In Redmond it's 79% white, 13% Asian, and 1.5% black.
jenk: Faye (Default)
Local paper has an article on software testing.

This article on how catastrophic medical costs don't just impact the uninsured reminds me of a discussion I had yesterday.

The NY Times premium columnist Nicholas Kristof has an article on the U.N. Population Fund, which supports contraception and maternity care in the developing world. Kristof describes women and children dying due to lack of medical care and reminds us that "[l]ast month, Mr. Bush again withheld all U.S. funds from the U.N. Population Fund." The title? "Mr. Bush, This Is Pro-Life?"

And the Business section has a headline that caught my eye: Economic View: If You Don't Eat or Drive, Inflation's No Problem.

Time to rotate laundry...

Profile

jenk: Faye (Default)
jenk

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011 121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 23rd, 2025 10:16 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios